Washington Planning Board
Meeting Minutes
December 6, 2022
0.0 Assembly: 6:30PM, on 2nd floor of Town
Hall
0.1 Members
present: Hatch, Revane and Schwartz, Kluk and Crandall joined on Zoom
0.2 Alternates
present: None
0.3 Visitors:
Kristine Chidester, Joel Chidester, Peter Mellen
Hatch called the meeting to order
at 6:30PM.
1.0
Minutes: November 1st Meeting Ð Hatch asked if any
changes were needed in the minutes, no changes or additions were mentioned. Revane
made a motion to approve the minutes as written, Kluk seconded the motion. Since
Kluk and Crandall were joining us on Zoom, Hatch did a roll call vote and all
voted in favor.
2.0
New Business:
2.1 Chidester
RV Issue Ð Kristine and Joel Chidester
were attending to discuss an issue with home construction and an RV permit
during construction. Joel said he is planning construction of a home on his lot
TM 11-39-02. He has been temporarily staying in an RV at 277 Old Marlow Road on
TM 11-38-01, which is owned by his parents. When they start construction on their
lot they would like to be able to get an RV permit under the construction
category, which allows you to stay for a longer period during construction.
They would like to be able to keep the RV on the Marlow Road lot instead of
moving it to the construction site lot. Kristine said this lot is abutting
their lot and has power and septic hookups and is not sloped like their
construction lot. Schwartz said that she thinks this is a ZBA issue and Hatch
agreed. Joel said that they met with the Select Board about it. He is planning
to start construction in the spring of 2023 and it will be finished within the
2-year period. Revane said that the BoS suggested that he come to the PB for an
interpretation of the LUO RV section. Hatch said the ZBA recently did a variance
for an RV permit during construction on a non-conforming lot. Schwartz said
this is a unique situation. Hatch suggested they get their construction permit
first, then apply for the variance. They have an RV permit that is good from
January to April, this will give them time to apply for the variance.
2.2 Peter
Mellen Ð presenting two minor
subdivisions. The first was for Fred Douglas who owns a 28.6-acre lot, TM 15-70
at 758 Faxon Hill Road. He provided us a copy of the application and all
required documents along with a waiver letter for 2 items. Douglas wants to
create one lot with 12 acres and the second lot would have the existing
dwelling on 16.8 acres.
The second was a minor subdivision for Margaret Ciriello,
TM 9-36, a 58-acre lot at 81 Sandy Knolls Road. He gave us a copy of the
application and all required documents along with a waiver letter for 8 items.
Ciriello is hoping to create a 20-acre lot with the existing garage containing
a living area above. The existing farmhouse would be on a 38-acre lot. Both
buildings have existing wells and separate septic systems. Kluk asked if the
lots could be re-subdivided in the future. A discussion of major and minor
subdivisions followed. We will discuss the need to address this issue in the
LUO, it is only in the Subdivision Regulations right now.
Mellen
will send Schwartz a digital copy of all the documents so she can share them
with members. We set a public hearing date for both subdivisions for January 3rd
at 6:30pm. Schwartz will notice for both subdivisions.
2.3 PB Report Ð Hatch had sent an outline of his report for inclusion in
the Annual Town report. We approved of his thoughts. He will flesh it out and
send the document to members.
2.4 BoS
Alternative plan for protection of Camp Morgan property Ð Hatch sent out the email he received from Deb to alert
the boards as to what the BoS were thinking. Revane said the BoS had invited
all the boards to a Select Board meeting but no one could attend so he is
attending all the separate boardÕs meetings. He said that the BoS didnÕt like
the concept of a conservation easement (CE) so they are looking for an
alternative plan. They felt that a CE would restrict the town from siting a
school or an alternative energy system on the property. He floated requiring a
super majority/paper ballot to make changes on the property and a committee
made up of several boards in town to oversee the property and its uses. He
wants to get a group of board members together in early January and nail down
some ideas to go to legal. Hatch asked if there was some precedent for going in
this direction. Kluk asked if the original deed for the property had any
restrictions. Schwartz thought we should do some research on this. Revane is
looking for a commitment from the board to have representation on the
committee. Schwartz said that the mandate from Town Meeting was to come back
this year with CE language. Hatch thinks it is too rushed to come back with a
legal document in time for Town Meeting, perhaps just asking if this is the way
the town wants to go as opposed to a CE is enough. Hatch said our board would
be in favor of being a part of the group.
3.0
Old Business:
3.1
Bruce Putnam Business Permit Ð To date we have not received the provided Site Plan Review
application from Putnam. Schwartz sent him a letter requesting that he return the
site plan application by tonightÕs meeting. We will return the issue to the BoS
to take care of it.
3.2
Zach Ordway Ð Business permit - Schwartz said that she had sent Ordway a request for
information about square footage and parking and a copy of the exemption to
site plan review. Nothing has been received to date.
3.3
Driveway Issues off State Roads Ð Schwartz sent out the reply we received from Matt Serge
on our driveway question. His answer in return was confusing. Hatch will send a
clean copy of the new language and ask for comments again. We will look at the
deadlines for holding a public hearing in January and set a date. The hearing
will also cover the changes we drafted for the sections #311 and #202.
3.4 Town Center
Vision project Ð Crandall said the
committee (with new members) will take on a new endeavor to look at the Town
property next to the Library for additional such as the community garden,
playground, etc. Revane said there is a shed building to hold tools, water on
site and parking. He said there is a possible need for outdoor lighting. The
vestibule for the Library construction is starting this week and they bought a
lot of the items needed over the year and have them stored.
3.5 Old School
House project Ð Revane said that the project
is nearly done. Ciardelli is hooking up the backup furnace and furniture has
been ordered and will be in soon. Several windows have glazing that is drying.
The front door is getting a new lock. The upstairs bathrooms need to be
finished.
3.6 Master Plan Ð place holder.
3.7 ZBA Report Ð Hatch said the board
remanded a permit back to the BoS. The applicantÕs attorneyÕs intent is to ask
for a rehearing but they need to reapply with a new permit application for a
new decision of why it is being sent to the ZBA.
Hatch brought up an issue with what the LUO says (#201.5
building coverage shall not exceed 10% of area of the lot and total impermeable
coverage, including building coverage, shall not exceed 20% the area of the lot)
and what the construction permit application (pg.4) says about impermeable
surfaces. The construction permit app needs a tweak to use the same language as
the LUO. The LUO may need a tweak to change ÒbuildingÓ to ÒstructureÓ. The
construction permit application also needs to ask what the existing structure
coverage is. We will work on this.
3.8 UVLSRPC Ð Hatch is attending a meeting
tomorrow night. He is continuing to speak with them about reporting issues.
4.0
Unresolved Business:
4.1
Setbacks on Non-Conforming Lots Ð no discussion this month.
5.0
Driveway Permits: None
6.0 Mergers: None
7.0
Communications:
7.1 Resignation letter from Paul Kapteyn Ð we received a letter from Paul stating his intent to resign as an alternate from the board. We have been so pleased to have his participation on the board and really donÕt want to lose him as an alternate. Kluk will speak with him again about continuing. We hope to keep him on in what ever capacity we can.
8.0 Date for next
Planning Board meeting Ð January 3rd, 2022 at 6:30pm on upper hall at Town
Hall.
9.0 Adjournment: Time:
8:23 PM
Motioned
by Crandall, seconded by Kluk, all voted in favor.
Respectfully Submitted,
Nan
Schwartz