WASHINGTON PLANNING BOARD
Master Plan Subcommittee
– Working meeting
Minutes
July 1, 2013
Members
present: Nan Schwartz, Jean Kluk, Steve Terani, Jim Crandall
The meeting was called to order by Nan Schwartz at 10AM. We looked over the minutes from the June 17th
meeting and all approved. Nan will post them on the PB website.
Jean Kluk asked if we want to
have agendas for our meetings and everyone agreed that that is helpful and
keeps things on track. We will do a printed agenda for the next meeting.
We went over our recruiting
progress. We had mostly noÕs but a couple of yesÕs and a couple of still possibles. We came up with three more names of people to
contact. We talked about the ideal size for a committee and decided that 10
people at most (including the 4 of us) would be good.
Terani commented that looking at other Master Plans it is
amazing what a variety of things towns include. We will have to figure out how
much we want to put in ours. Christine Walker from UVLSRPC said that a she
prefers a more concise document that the public would be more likely to read,
when she met with us. Crandall agreed but Schwartz commented that the MP will be used mostly by the PB for planning purposes
and needs to contain the information we will use, Kluk
concurred.
We decided to go ahead with
the announcement on the town website and Nixle this
week and get it in the SelectmenÕs minutes next week. Because of 4th
of July, the Selectmen are not having a meeting this week and wonÕt have
minutes. We will go with a blurb and attach the Volunteer document to the
minutes, next week. We decided to go with ÒWe need your help to plan
WashingtonÕs futureÓ, see attachment below. We will add all four of our names
for contacts at the bottom of the announcement document.
We decided our next meeting will be on Monday July 15th at 8:30AM. We will
meet that day as our small group and make plans for the first meeting with the
entire group.
We then discussed the materials
we would need for our volunteers. We decided to make packets with the present
Master Plan, the timeline, copies of surveys from Washington, Goshen and
Dorchester, and the MP chapter content analysis sheet.
We discussed the community
survey. Nan looked at Survey Monkey and said it isnÕt possible to key the
surveys so we decided to go with doing our survey by mail only. We want the
surveys to be anonymous but we will include a slip they can fill out to be
eligible to win the syrup. We discussed getting input for the survey from all
town boards, departments and committees. They departments may have ideas about
what they would like included for questions. We will do this right away rather
than wait. Jean will draft a solicitation letter for the departments and we
will attach our 2003 survey so they can see what was asked previously.
We looked at the surveys from
Goshen, Dorchester, Washington and Tamworth that we had on hand, and discussed
what we like about them. Schwartz commented that services and facilities need to be separated. We could
include a question about Town Government, historic preservation, Junk
yards/junky yards, and a few others. DorchesterÕs survey had a question that
asked which part of town the respondent lives in with a map, maybe we will we
include one in our survey. We will each try to come up with categories for
survey questions to bring to the next meeting. We will continue to contact
possible volunteers.
We will meet again on July 15th
at 8:30AM.
Meeting
adjourned at 11:07 AM.
Respectfully
submitted,
Nan
Schwartz
Planning Board Secretary